|
|
|
|
Media and readers of
my articles about atomic
bombs 1945,
moon
trips 1969,
M/S Estonia
ferry incident
1994 and 911
tower top down terrorist
collapses
2001 are warned. You probably suffer from
cognitive
dissonance
and cannot handle my information without getting
mentally disturbed with serious
consequences. My proven
facts are simple and correct and good news. A-bombs
do not work. Humans cannot travel to the
Moon. M/S Estonia didn't lose her bow visor.
Skyscrapers do not collapse from top down.
All information to the contrary is pseudoscience,
propaganda lies or fantasies promoted by
media and taught at universities. And
if you do not agree with the official lies, you
will not be allowed at the university boat race*
and other silly events, etc. Your position in
society is at risk. If you suffer from
cognitive
dissonance,
you no doubt find my info disturbing and get upset,
angry, anxious or worried. What to believe and
write? Old lies or truth? Media incl.
newspaper chief editors are kindly requested to get
psychological assistance to get rid of their
cognitive
dissonance.
Why not cure yourself? And publish the result
as a scoop. *Safety at sea is
my business (a) IN
GENERAL.- Congress affirms that the authority of
the President to use all necessary and
appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization
for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50
U.S.C. 1541 note) includes the authority
for the Armed Forces of the United States to
detain covered persons (as defined in
subsection (b)) pending disposition under the
law of war. (b) COVERED
PERSONS. - A covered person under this section
is any person as follows: (1) A person
who planned, authorized, committed, or aided
the
terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11,
2001,
or harbored those responsible for those
attacks. (2) A person
who was a part of or substantially supported
al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that
are engaged in hostilities against the United
States or its coalition partners, including any
person who has committed a belligerent act or
has directly supported such hostilities in aid
of such enemy forces. National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2012 It would
appear Prof. Bazant and others mentioned below
are covered persons to be detained as per above
US law as they suggest and support the false
idea that flying planes into weak tops of towers
will cause the structural destruction of the
strong bottoms of the towers. You wonder why
they are still at large. Is the President or
military sleeping? Like the FBI? I will explain
more at the Engineering
Mechanics Institute conference at
Evanston,
IL, USA, early August, 2013 |
||
|
|
|
On 7 October 2001, the US Global War On Terror started and is still on with millions killed. The US terrorists, apart from now having lost the War On Terror overlooked one important matter: No structure or tower can be destroyed by gravity from above initiated by local structural failures up top caused, e.g. by a plane. It is also explained at 1.18.50 in DVD2 - a film about the 911 incident. In order to fool the public the US terrorists asked Hollywood to produce a movie showing the WTC towers being stricken by planes and collapsing (sic) progressively by gravity from top down, etc, that the terrorists then broadcasted 'live on TV' assisted by US media, when the complete WTC-complex was destroyed using explosives. As the rubble would reveal how the towers really were destroyed the area was fenced off and faked pictures of the rubble itself were also published. Many persons get very upset of the thought that all footage of the 9/11 NY WTC destructions are fake. |
Photo by Thomas Nilsson - The above initiation of the destruction of WTC 2 on 911, i.e. top part tilting and dropping, smoke and debris being ejected, etc., is not possible because structures cannot break down like that ... by gravity. The photo, incl. tree in front, building right, smoke glued to a tilting top in center, etc, is a fake (produced in Hollywood). Thomas Nilsson should be detained as a covered person! |
|
These persons must like the Anders Björkman Challenge! The Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI, is supporting the US terrorists and will not, after several contacts, review the below information. Soon after 9/11, the FBI recruited experienced intelligence analysts from other agencies and students with critical skill sets from universities around the country. Since 2001 (until 2011), the FBI has nearly tripled the number of intelligence analysts to 3 118. However, a simple fact remains: No structure or tower can be destroyed by gravity from top down initiated by local structural failures up top, i.e. that the weak top crushes the strong bottom. The FBI has failed the Anders Björkman Challenge 1. |
The above picture has been made by a scientist suggesting weak tops of any structure crushes the bottoms of same structure keeping the tops up. This person should be detained as a covered person! |
|
Dave
Thomas of NMSR,
Albuquerque, NM, a dull desert town which looks
bankrupt, thought he could win the Challenge
after I made a presentation
there
but failed completely and miserably. Dave
thinks that dropping one bag C of rice on a
kitchen scale (WTC) or on 9 bags A of rice
will crush the scale (WTC) or the 9 bags A
of rice, while the bag C, evidently, just
bounced on the scale or on the 9 bags A,
because the scale or A applied exactly the
same impact force on the bag C
of rice that the bag C of rice applied on
the scale or A, when impact
contact occurred. Dave
does not understand that the impact
force is of very short duration and the
energy content is only that of the
released potential energy that cannot even buckle
the top of a kitchen scale or demolish a grain of
rice in a bag of rice. What
happens is that the impact force is
transmitted to ground, while the scale/structure in
between is elastically compressed. An identical
impact force is applied to the moving
top (or bag of rice) that is likewise elastically
compressed (actually friction between the rice
corns absorbs all the energy) during the short
duration of the impact. Dave
shows in the second part of his paper an animation
of one WTC tower destruction, where the tower
itself is erased manually and smoke and debris are
added - it look like a fountain. It is a simple
trick film prepared in advance to be broadcast
live on TV to brainwash the US
population that believes anything shown on TV. The
towers were in the meantime destroyed from bottom
up. I have asked Dave several times to drop a bag C of rice on 9 bags A of rice to destroy the nine bags A of rice and invite media to have a look but ... John Geohegan also of NMSR thinks one mass impacting one, two, three masses attached to a rod is the solution but forgets that the rod and the masses remain intact. Only some tooth picks broke. The Anders Björkman Challenge 1 has been open since March 2010 and there was still - September 2020 - 126 months and >80.000+ downloads of this page later - no successful Challenger/structure! The prize is € 1 000 000:-. Come on terrorists and salary slaves! And why not US President B. Obama himself. Or Donald Trump! Show that you are really smart and can destroy strong skyscrapers and similar structures by flying light aluminium planes into the tops of steel and concrete. Do not try to fool me with fake animations 'live on TV'! And do not tell me that USA (1st May 2011) killed a man that did it 9+ years ago! Prove it in a legal court and do not kill people without trial. Both Obama and Osama have failed the Anders Björkman Challenge 1! The terrorists are still free and around in USA to attack again. While FBI sleeps. The Anders Björkman Challenge 2 about a trip in space with humans aboard and Anders Björkman Challenge 3 about how to produce steam and/or electric energy by fusion are described at other pages.
The Anders Björkman Challenge 1 is very simple! You are requested
to describe a structure where a small top
part C
can crush the much bigger bottom part A from
above, when top part C
is
dropped by gravity on bottom part A and to
show it in a laboratory. The
structure with parts C and A
can look like the structure right or below,
e.g. a
square block of any material/elements
(e.g.
steel or wood floors and pillars or whatever)
connected together plus plenty of air between the
elements! All elements and joints of the structure
must evidently be weak and break easily! The
total structure can have any mass or density, e.g.
density 0.25 (kg/cm3) or 250
(kg/m3), i.e. light, like the
WTC
towers
that were mostly air ... like a bale of
cotton. The top part
C is the 1/10th top of the total structure! It
has mass M kilograms (kg)! M can be 1 kg or 100 000
000 kg! It does not matter. The drop
height is max 3.7 meters! The bottom
part A is the 9/10th bottom of the total
structure. It has mass 9 M kilograms. It means A is
9 times bigger than C! When top part
C with mass M impacts bottom part A from above
after a free fall drop of 3.7 meters by gravity (g
= 9.82 m/s²), it applies 36.334 M Joule energy
to the (total) structure with mass
10 M. Will bottom
part A with mass 9 M be crushed into rubble by top
part C with mass M? Can 3.63 Joule energy
initiate a collapse destruction of 1
kilogram of A? That's the
Challenge! The Anders Björkman
Challenge! According US authorities incl. US
presidents of all kinds, security advisors,
agencies, experts, universities and plenty idiots
of all types it happens all the time! Little
weak, top C (with density 0.25) crushes big
strong, bottom A (with same density 0.25),
i.e. the one layer C top part crushes,
POUFF,
POUFF,
the nine layers of bottom A, one after the
other, into rubble (with density
1)! Left is seen a
false top down collapse as decribed in a video by
Richard
Gage of A&E 911
Truth.
The top
part C is
supposed to remain intact when crushing
bottom
part A
and it should not produce silly smoke
to hide what is happening Richard Gage is
right about the fact that the images are 100% fake
but he is wrong about the suggestion that airplanes
piloted by Arabs started the fires in the tops of
the skyscrapers. All footage of WTC1/2 on fire on
911 with people running around in the streets below
is a pre-recorded Hollywood movie broadcast live on
TV on 11 September 2001. So bear this in
mind when trying to win my
Challenge. Ten Tips how
to win the Anders Björkman Challenge
1! 1.
Here
is explained in detail how two identical structures
collapsed from top down, i.e. how two towers
suddenly collapsed from top following the initial
impact of the top on the bottom. Just copy/paste
the structure and ideas, do and film the collapse
and you win €1 000 000:- . 2.
Here
is a propaganda video with various 'experts'
telling you why two towers at NY suddenly became
rubble ... from top down ... by gravity alone. Very
helpful in order to win the Anders Björkman
Challenge 1! 3. Here is
another idea
how to ensure a terrorist (2.2.1.5)
Progression of Collapse from top down of a
structure: Note that only 2%
of the potential energy of the structure is
stored in the top part C and 98% in the
bottom part A and by releasing it, little
top part C can crush anything below, i.e.
big, strong bottom part A! Evidently there
is no relationship between stored potential
energy and the energy required to rip apart
structural elements, but anyway ... . It is
typical terrorist slur! But try it anyway and you
may win €1 000 000:- . 5. Use flimsy bolts to connect the supporting elements as per Massachusetts Institute of Technology ideas! They break easy! 6. Or use the wikipedia system: In the case of both towers, the top section tilted towards the face that had buckled, behaving largely as a solid block separate from the rest of the building. It fell at least one story in freefall and impacted the lower sections with a force equivalent to over thirty times its own weight. This was sufficient to buckle the columns of the story immediately below it; the block then fell freely through the distance of another story. Total collapse was now unavoidable as the process repeated through the entire height of the lower sections. The force of each impact was also much greater than the horizontal momentum of the section (LOL), which kept the tilt from increasing significantly before the falling section reached the ground. It remained intact throughout the collapse, with its center of gravity within the building's footprint. After crushing the lower section of the building, it was itself crushed when it hit the ground. 7. Another way to design a structure where the top C can crush bottom A is evidently by not following the professional, expert advice in the February 2007 issue of Best Practices for Reducing the Potential for Progressive Collapse in Buildings (NISTIR 7396) by Bruce R. Ellingwood, Georgia Institute of Technology, Robert Smilowitz, Weidlinger Associates, Donald O. Dusenberry, Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, Dat Duthinh, H.S. Lew, National Institute of Standards and Technology Building and Fire Research Laboratory, Nicholas J. Carino, Consultant. None of the authors have won the Anders Björkman Challenge 1 though! Professional experts on progressive collapse cannot describe a structure that collapses progressively from top down by terrorist acts. You should wonder why experts like that support terrorism. 8. Use
the software of Applied
Element
Method.com
that is dedicated to educating engineers about top
down progressive collapse, etc., and see what
happens when top C tries to crush bottom
A. 9. Or use
the Extreme
Loading® for
Structures
(ELS) software that allows structural engineers to
accurately analyze and visualize progressive
(disproportionate) collapse resulting from impact
loads by a top C from above on a structure
A! 10. Of course
there are many web
sites
explaining that it is perfectly normal that weak
tops of steel structures can crush the much
stronger bottom parts and their joints by gravity
from top down. Such web
sites
are simply made by terrorists! Use the info and try
collect € 1M from the Anders Björkman
Challenge organizer! Terrorists use
the effects of progressive top down collapse to
destroy skyscrapers on 911 after flying planes into
the tops, you have seen live on TV! Amazing! A new
(?) phenomenom used for the first time in history
by terrorists surprised the US with its pants down!
And GWB was also sleeping! In charge of a
SUPERPOWER! Is it only a
matter of the joints of the load supporting
elements? A joint breaks up top (due fire) and
releases elements that break more joints that
release more elements that break many more joints,
etc? A chain reaction breaking joints from top
down! But breaking joints require energy! Can
gravity provide it pulling down top C? Why doesn't
weak little top part C just bounce on big
strong bottom part A instead of breaking joints
or fall besides part A? Wouldn't you expect
THAT? It has always happened before! 1 000 000+ times!
3.63 Joule energy per kilogram structure is very
little. Can it break a joint? In order to crush such a structure you have to deform, buckle or break the members and break the connections and for that work has to be done and a short time impact force due to gravity from above - small top C dropping on big bottom A destroying bottom A from above - cannot do that work. It must be from bottom upp - top C being destroyed from below. The basic
questions are of course: Can a big,
strong skyscraper, e.g. WTC 1 or 2 at NY, collapse
progressively from top down to ground by gravity
into rubble due to local damages up top and create
a Ground Zero as indicated in figure
left? a) Strange
'planes' hit the weak tops C of
skyscrapers and make holes in them and put them on
fire? b) Will top
C suddenly drop on intact bottom
A? d) Will the big,
intact, undamaged bottom, much stronger parts
A of the skyscrapers below suddenly
'collapse'? From top? Down? To ground? Twice
on same day? e) Will top
C land on top of the rubble of
A? f) Will top
C then ... disappear?
xxxx
 It goes something like this according picture above. Steps 1 - 5 = top C crushes A (with density 0.25) from above into rubble B (with density 1) by gravity. And then, step 5, part C (with density 0.25) collides with rubble B (what is left of A) that is on ground = top C becomes more rubble B by gravity = step 7, when the rubble B forms a pyramide by gravity. Step 8 - mast falls off by gravity = only roof of top C remains on top of all rubble B = POUFF, POUFF, POUFF! Actually the roof of top C should now punch a square hole by gravity in the Earth's crust but for unknown reasons it doesn't happen. The Earth was too strong. As any child understands, the NIST explanation is criminal nonsense! First all elements deform elastically and, if anything breaks, it is always the supporting elements in top C that break first (as they are weaker in this case) and a smaller top part C (it has lost 1 m) may then drop 3.7 meters and produce a second collision, when smaller top part C is further damaged. This may continue until C is totally destroyed or just partially destroyed from below, i.e. when it cannot apply sufficient energy to produce more failures.
No structure of any kind collapses from top down! It is always from bottom up, top C is damaged in this example. So to win the Challenge 1 you have to come up with some other type of structure that really can collapse from top down! I look forward to that. I will happily pay you € 1 000 000:- if you can do that. I cannot find any structure in Universe that meets my Challenge 1 though. Reason is simple!
|
|
|
